<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Σχόλια στο TipJoy as email postage?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.postmaster.gr/2008/09/23/tipjoy-as-email-postage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.postmaster.gr/2008/09/23/tipjoy-as-email-postage/</link>
	<description>Managing organized complexity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:51:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Από: Stazybο Hοrn</title>
		<link>http://blog.postmaster.gr/2008/09/23/tipjoy-as-email-postage/#comment-41213</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stazybο Hοrn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 11:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamo.wordpress.com/?p=610#comment-41213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I missed tipjoy. It looks nice in principle.

I guess the real load with spam is on the infrastructure, not the end user; so any solution should target the infrastructure, not the receiver&#039;s inbox. Venema is even harsher: 

&lt;i&gt;&quot;In my personal opinion, the reliability of email reached its maximum near 1998; it has gone down ever since as the result of increasingly aggressive anti-spam/virus measures. This observation has led me to conclude that the spammers aren&#039;t destroying the email infrastructure, it&#039;s the well-meaning people with their countermeasures.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I missed tipjoy. It looks nice in principle.</p>
<p>I guess the real load with spam is on the infrastructure, not the end user; so any solution should target the infrastructure, not the receiver&#8217;s inbox. Venema is even harsher: </p>
<p><i>&#8220;In my personal opinion, the reliability of email reached its maximum near 1998; it has gone down ever since as the result of increasingly aggressive anti-spam/virus measures. This observation has led me to conclude that the spammers aren&#8217;t destroying the email infrastructure, it&#8217;s the well-meaning people with their countermeasures.&#8221;</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

